The Logical Anarchy Today Show Episode 211 – The Failure of SJW Themes in Entertainment

Logical Anarchy Today – Logical Anarchy Today Show Episode 211 – The Failure of SJW Themes in Entertainment

On Today’s episode, Jon discusses the recent failure in entertainment media to shove SJW rhetoric down our throats. He talks about BioWare, Marvel, and Doctor Who. This episode is for all the nerds out there.

The Marvel Interview in Question

Logical Anarchy Merchandise

Tom Woods Liberty Classroom

Interested in Bitcoin as an alternative to US Dollars? Use our Coinbase link!

If you sign up with our coinbase link and purchase $100 in bitcoin, you will receive an extra $10 from coinbase.

The “Shift” Bitcoin debit card is through coinbase as well.

Support the show by entering Amazon through our link HERE!

Support the show with Bitcoin HERE!

Use this address to add the Logical Anarchy Today show to your podcatcher or subscribe on iTunes!

Liberty Classroom!

Logical Anarchy Today Episode 172 – Cultural Appropriation is BS

Logical Anarchy Today – Logical Anarchy Today Episode 172 – Cultural Appropriation is BS

Cultural appropriation is one of the many “sins” one can commit within the “Christian Heresy” known as Social Justice and Leftism. Today’s episode is an explanation as to why it really shouldn’t be a big deal.

Check out and Protect Yourself Economically

Logical Anarchy Merchandise

Tom Woods Liberty Classroom

Interested in Bitcoin as an alternative to US Dollars? Use our Coinbase link!

If you sign up with our coinbase link and purchase $100 in bitcoin, you will recieve an extra $10 from coinbase.

The “Shift” Bitcoin debit card is through coinbase as well.

Support the show by entering Amazon through our link HERE!

Support the show with Bitcoin HERE!

Use this address to add the Logical Anarchy Today show to your podcatcher or subscribe on iTunes!

Buy Gold and Silver - Money Metals Exchange

The Alt-Right are the Right’s “SJWs”

In a previous post, I talked about how the Alternative Right (Alt-Right) libertarians are wrong in thinking that the NAP allows for the punishment of “thought criminals” like communists and socialists. As much as I would love to toss commies out of choppers (it makes for a funny meme), it is just cannot be justified due to the proportionality aspect of the NAP. I outlined this “lex talionis” aspect of the NAP in that previous post and demonstrated that by killing someone for having dangerous thoughts, one actually becomes the aggressor and the commie would actually be justified in defending themselves. By extension, advocating for the death of people with dangerous ideas is likewise dangerous. So by their very own logic they condemn themselves to death. My stance is the same stance as Ludwig Von Mises when he said “Only ideas can overcome ideas and it is only the ideas of Capitalism and of [Classical] Liberalism that can overcome Socialism. Only by a battle of ideas can a decision be reached.” Notice that he did not mention helicopters.

I wanted to continue my study of the alt-right though. It’s a fascinating sub-culture of “conservatism” and recently I had an interesting run in with “Labor for Trump” on twitter. Anarchyball posted a meme that pretty much illustrated how the disproportionate ideas of force advocated by the “alt-right” shows its illegitimate nature. As a side note, I find it hilarious that an “alt-right” person likes FDR enough to make them their profile picture.

The Language and Rhetoric of the Alt-Right

Now there are a great many of these people on twitter who see Trump as almost their savior. To them, it seems that Trump has transcended that of being just a political candidate and has become the harbinger of their great meme war against the left. And in full honesty, watching an alt right person take on a leftist is hilarious.

left v alt right

But it wasn’t until I actually spoke to someone like “Labor For Trump” that I realized something. Many on the Alt-Right are just the bizarro version of the leftist SJW. They use the same tactics, have their own buzzwords and generally follow the same illogical lines of argumentation the SJWs use but with their own “alt-right twist”. The one thing they lack, but are gaining more of everyday, is the cultural pull the SJWs have. These Alt-Right people have their own leaders and icons beyond just Trump. Milo Yiannopoulos, and Vox Day are two such people that many on the Alt-Right look up to (I admire both of those men for their own reasons), but I feel that their in-your-face message is lost on many of their followers. Ironically, I think Vox Day’s “SJW Attack Survival Guide” could easily be adapted to when one is mobbed by these alt-right meme lovers. I find it ironic that understanding the attacks of the extreme alt-right can be understood through Vox’s careful dissection of SJW attacks.

The alt-right does, however, have their own language. Sometimes you will see things like this on twitter and social media:

Notice the “(((Von Mises)))”? This is what these alt-right people use when referencing something as “Jewish”. Why they do it I do not know. Perhaps “Jewishness” triggers them like the plethora of things that trigger the SJWs? But this is known as an “(((echo)))” and is, again, used as a way to point out someone or something of Jewish background. So, whatever, who cares? I’m not going to pretend that this offends me. It’s kind of silly really and, like the SJWs, to me shows this “inside joke” meme speak similar to things like “CIS” and “Het” on the left. This seems to be a feature of neo-reactionary culture regardless of what side of the isle you are on.

It was after I received a few of these tweets that I realized something. These tweets sound a lot of like how SJWs internally slander their enemies. Instead of “This is how Jewish libertarians do ‘logic'”, a leftist would say “This is how CIS het libertarians do ‘logic'”. Instead of “autistic reply”, it would be “racist reply”. Instead of “Jews made the NAP”, a leftist would say “the patriarchy invented the NAP”. These “rebuttals” follow the exact same formula that leftist SJW responses do. Instead of saying “your opinion doesn’t matter because you’re a straight white man”, these alt-right people say “You’re NAP doesn’t count because a Jew liked it.” Honestly, I don’t see either response as worse than the other, they are both poor attempts at logic and rhetoric. Ironically, when I pointed this out to “Labor for Trump”, I received this:

When he said this, I couldn’t help but chuckle. This person, instead of taking on the arguments I put forth, thought that a valid refutation of the idea would be attacking the character of those that once held the idea like Mises. Within discourse, this is an ad hominem where the arguer tries to attack the character or traits of the other person rather than the argument itself and it has the unfortunate side effect of still leaving the actual argument unchallenged.

Is this not what the left SJWs do as well? Vox Day says the following when encountering SJW’s in his survival guide:

“The second thing is to recognize that there is no way you are going to be able to reason your way out of the situation. Most people who come under SJW attack have the causality backwards. They think the attack is taking place due to whatever it is that they did or said. That’s not the case. The attack is taking place because of who you are and what you represent to the SJWs: a threat to their Narrative… The most important thing to accept here is the complete impossibility of compromise or even meaningful communication with your attackers. SJWs do not engage in rational debate because they are not rational and they do not engage in honest discourse because they do not believe in objective truth.”

Replace “SJW” with “Alt-Right” and it still works perfectly fine. These people on the Alt-Right have their own narrative similar to that of the SJW. SJWs have a profound hatred of anyone that does not think like them and the alt-right is just the mirror reflection of that. These people on the extreme alt-right, likewise, do not care about objective truth, but about heckling and defaming anyone that does not think like them. Bringing it back to “quality rhetoric”, I find it funny that when I would try to explain a logical line of argumentation, “Labor For Trump” would respond with the above tweets. When called on the fact that he hasn’t refuted anything, he responds with “You’re rhetoric sucks”. I see another parallel with SJWs here. The parallel being that SJWs are allowed to be illogical and have their arguments considered valid while anyone that challenges them is immediately wrong because of the mere fact that they challenged them. Here we have the Alt-Right engaging in the same double standard: “I’m right because I’m Alt-Right, you’re wrong because you disagree with me.” And because of this profoundly stupid line of thinking, both the SJW and the Alt-Right person feel justified in calling you a “racist” or a “kike” and strutting around like they have now won the debate. To quote Vox Day, “SJWs do not engage in rational debate because they are not rational and they do not engage in honest discourse”.

Therefore, the tragic irony of the many on the Alt-Right like “Labor for Trump” is that they become the very thing they hate without realizing it. They engage in the exact same kind of botched “argumentation” as the SJW and both have their own internal language and buzzwords that they use to shut down arguments so that neither the SJW or the neo-reactionary on the “Alt-Right” have to actually deal with the content of the things said.

The alt-right is just another arm of “the social justice war” waged by statists and this makes many of those on the Alt-Right enemies of liberty and freedom just like their SJW brethren.

Who is “Trigglypuff”?

triggerlypuff#Trigglypuff is the internet name bestowed upon a young “woman” and social justice warrior who’s real name is Cora Segal. She has also assumed the name Cora Gales and Cora Miriam. Never in my life have I seen someone who so epitomizes the extreme caricatures critics of feminism and social justice put forth. I think most people thought that someone like Trigglypuff was an extreme impossibility. Surely no one could be so blind and stupid as to argue that the body mass index was invented by white supremacists and that socialism and communism are better than capitalism because it caters more to fat people. Surely, these are strawmen created by critics like myself to paint SJWs and 3rd wave feminist “intellectuals” as degenerates. Those insensitive critics among us have to be making things up by saying that these SJWs advocate for the idea that over weight people live longer and are less susceptible to heart disease. These SJWs are rational and scientific people! They would never make claims that say capitalism is evil because it creates tyranny for fat people by enforcing the hegemonic rule of healthy eating! These people have facts on their side! They are college educated! But this is exactly what hate filled Cora Segal argues.

The video above shows the insanity of these people. I, in particular, love that she will not shut up and keeps interrupting Miss Sommers. When told that if she refuses to be quiet she will be forced to leave, she responds “Free speech!”

You see, when you oppose these people ideologically you are being a filthy tyrannical and patriarchal oppressor of fat, transgendered, queer, black, and economically weak womenfolk. Because of this, free speech does not apply to you. Free speech only applies to those that see the world as these people see it. There is nothing tyrannical about that though!

triggerlypuffcapitalismI wanted to know more about this young “lady” so I tried to see if she popped up on facebook. I think since the above video broke, she has either deleted her profile or made it hidden and private. Thankfully the internet is a wonderful place and much of what you post is never really gone forever (so be careful what you post). I was able to find this archived save of her profile (here is a screencap of her okcupid profile if you are into that sort of thing). So much of this is just pure gold. It’s a window into the mind of a violent and hateful psychopath and I think that a team of psychologists, anthropologists and sociologists should study this scatological mess. I found it through this archived post from facebook where she is sorry she can’t make it to a protest against “Autism Speaks” (because that organization “is an ableist, eugenicist hate group that aims to eliminate Autistic people”).

Actually, I know exactly why she is the way she is. I don’t need a team of experts to figure this out. She is a product of the disease of socialism. Socialism is an intellectual cancer. It spreads just like cancer within the psyche of people at the expense of rationalism, logic and intelligent thought. The obsession in socialism with equality is not compassionate but an obsession with one’s self and spreads to all other modes of thinking and feeling to where everything must be filtered through their selfish notion of “equality” (by “selfish” I mean how they scheme to live at the expense of others). Look at that archived facebook profile of hers. How many selfies of yourself do you need? Socialism goes hand in hand with narcissism. She thinks socialism is better for fat people because she is lazy herself. She has an aversion to hard work and effort.

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”

“Legal plunder has two roots: One of them, as I have said before, is in human greed; the other is in false philanthropy.”

“When does plunder cease, then? When it becomes more burdensome and more dangerous than labor.”

The above quotes belong to Claude Frédéric Bastiat. It is almost as if he foresaw, in 1850, the rise of these intellectual troglodytes. Somehow he gave them a very accurate mental evaluation from the mid 19th century. Bastiat rightly observed that then, as now, plunder is easier than hard work. The kicker is that these idiots think they have the moral high ground in expropriating your property because they are “tolerant” and you are a subhuman white supremacist that wants to make fat people eat healthy, rape defenseless coeds in college, and you have the audacity to think that you are entitled to the fruits of your labor. All of this goes hand in hand. Social justice is just another violent facet of the socialist dream for equality. A dream where everyone is free in eking a life out in the mud and filth. And should you EVER think of bettering yourself beyond that of your peers, prepare to have violence done against you to keep you in line. This, they say, is the only way to fight the tyranny of capitalism. The tyranny that brought about the pill which liberated women from having to be wives and mothers if they did not wish to be so. The tyranny that has lifted people out of poverty by increasing efficiency and wealth through the division of labor. The tyranny of free and voluntary trade between consenting individuals. The tyranny that gives the poorest of the poor the ability to rise from poverty and into wealth through hard work and entrepreneurship.

No, we don’t want any of that. This 3rd wave feminist movement is nothing more than the offshoot of the wrong headed and factually false concepts of socialism and how stealing the property and labor of others somehow “frees” us. In the end, it legalizes and codifies theft and violence against your neighbor. This is because to claim the fruits of another’s labor is to claim what made that labor possible; their body. To claim ownership of another’s body is to advocate for slavery. Funny how feminism and socialism become the very things they abhor and yet these people look at someone like myself and say I am the tyrant. To me, it’s just them projecting the ugliness of themselves onto others so that they never have to look at the hateful mass of flesh that they subconsciously understand themselves to be.

Do you enjoy content like this? Support us by shopping on Amazon through our affiliate links. There is no extra cost to you!

An Anti-Feminist Rant

I don’t get this third wave feminism wrecking our culture today. It really is a cancer and I don’t care who is offended by that. It’s a bunch of professional victims with mental instabilities. These “ladies” (they’re not ladies) take issue when a man professes what he thinks a woman should be or makes generalizations about women. Yet, these hypocrites have no problem telling men what it means to be a man and assuming that all men are rapists (thus making young men in universities go to “consent” classes).
They talk about the patriarchy. If the patriarchy was really a thing, they should be thanking it. It’s men who invented the pill, the washing machine and many other devices that liberated women from the domestic life and allowed them to compete with men in the market.
They talk about male privilege and I want to know where that privilege is? Over 90% of elementary school teachers are women and elementary education is directly geared towards girls and how they learn. Boys are then punished for being boys and not sitting still for 6 hours.
Men have to register for the draft. Men cannot be “raped” as rape is defined by these feminists. Men commit suicide more than women. Men are not “privileged”, we just have a whole different set of issues to deal with than women. So kindly, feminists, stop being moronic selfish professional victims. You claim to be “strong independent women” and yet are offended by the smallest remark and clamor for safe spaces. You are weak. You are pathetic and you hide the truly strong and courageous women under the waves of your stupidity.